Our Position on AGW/Global Warming/Climate Change:
Since we have had the ability to have an internet presence (right after Algore invented it) our position on this subject has remained consistent. In 2001, the IPCC (The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) the political governing body governing the science of AGW as it was then known, issued their agreement with our position: “In climate research and modeling, we should recognize that we are dealing with a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore that long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible.” This is buried in the IPCC’s Third Assessment Report (2001), Section 22.214.171.124. page 774.
Because the IPCC was never organized to be anything but a political body striving to prove a false theory (AGW) what their contributing scientists wrote was simply skipped over if it did not agree with their predetermined outcome. This is not science. This is propaganda.
Until the principle of the statement in red (above) can be proven wrong, all climate models produced are proving themselves wrong. The models fail because the variables in the theory are enormous and very few have been included. The biggest green house gas, water vapor, is not even part of the assumptions in creating the 102 models that have all shown themselves to be wrong. Carbon dioxide is barely perceptible compared to water vapor, and is not a toxic gas as the EPA has ruled. It is the gas of life, without which, this discussion would not be taking place. The world is warming, but not because of carbon dioxide and nowhere near as alarmingly as the political schemers at the IPCC want you to believe. Follow the money and you will see exactly who is getting rich in the process.
I’m always mystified by people who come unhinged when they see us publish what violates their understanding of the Climate Change/AGW/Global Warming scheme. In virtually all cases, they have not explored the science involved, and quite possibly they cannot follow the complexity of the issues involved. This is why we have provided the statement and link from the IPCC’s own report on this fantastic scheme to separate real dollars from the taxpayers that have been duped by corrupt politicians to bankroll schemes that even the EPA admits, will make no difference in altering world temperatures.
When Albert Einstein published his theory, about 100 scientists published against him, and as he responded to them, and I am paraphrasing, why 100 scientists, when just one falsifying experiment could prove Einstein wrong. Look up Karl Popper to understand what he meant.